Author: Irami

What Is Consent?

Here is my latest on consent:

Music Credits:
Give It to Me Baby, Rick James; and Fire, Ohio Players.

For more information about first and second order desires, there is Frankfurt’s piece Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person and David Lewis’s piece on dispositonal theories of value, but normally I associate second order desires with alcoholics wanting to stop and other instances of people reflecting on their own desires. It was Steven Smith’s book on Hegel that got me thinking in terms of second order desires as being claims on other people’s desire, and how second order desires bring us to think of desire satisfaction as a problem for political freedom.

On pg. 117, Smith takes the desire for recognition as a second order desire, a desire about how we want to be seen. It’s a desire about other people’s comportment towards us, so if I want you to see me as a hot lover, the object of my desire is your desire for me. And when the object of a desire is a desire, the logic of its satisfaction is going to be different from when the object of a desire is something else, and in satisfying these second order desire, we have to talk about conditions of possibility, rather than force and cause. (I suspect HRC is feeling this frustration right now: she can’t force or cause me to want her.) That’s how second order desires take on a political valence. I’ve never seen them quite used like this, but I think this is right and a helpful way to talk about consent in a way that leans on contemporary literature.

I also mention Nancy Hirschmann’s book, The Subject of Liberty. It really is a lovely book for all of those interested in feminism, rational choice, and freedom.

 

Synced Sequence Replaced.00_01_14_00.Still001

Grace Lee Boggs

I’ve been cruising through Grace Lee Boggs’ autobiography, Living for Change. I’m not huge into autobiographies, but her book is less about who she is and more about why she wants what she wants for us.

Grace Lee Boggs

The book is trained on the struggle. Here is the first paragraph:
“I was born above my father’s Chinese American restaurant in downtown Providence, Rhode Island, on June 27 1915. When I cried, the waiters used to say, ‘Leave her on the hillside to die. She’s only a girl.’ Later they told me this as a kind of joke. But for me, even as a child, it was no laughing matter. Early on, it gave me an inkling that all is not right with this world. It also made me wonder whether going back to China was such a good idea.”
And it just goes from there, for DECADES. You see how her inkling is cultivated by luck, mentors, and studious labor. She appreciates in a charming way how people hold contradictions, e.g., she is both greatly indebted to and impressed by CLR James, and also found him increasingly petulant and self-absorbed in a way that got in the way of his scholarship and action.
A few bits stand out:
1) The black union activists in Detroit were black union activists. For decades, Jim Boggs works a full shift at Chrysler, gets home to write an article, go to a meeting, organize an action, then get up the next morning at 5 to go back to work.
2) You see the contingency of the Black Liberation struggle in America. It’s all really dicey. In the early 50s, it seems that we could just as easily be under some man’s thumb for another 200 years.
3) I find Chapter Six, Beyond Rebellion, to be the most enjoyable. She and her husband James had just gotten back to Detroit after the ’67 rebellion, and they were still trying to process the significance of it. How do you move from a rebellion to a revolution that changes the way people relate to each other?
They figured that they have to break with Marx. They interpret Marx as arguing that capitalist production disciplines and socializes workers for political action, and all the revolutionary leader has to do is expose the workers to the exploitation of their circumstances, and the workers will know what to do with their anger. In contrast, Boggs argues that you actually have to train workers as organizers and theoreticians, so that they transform themselves, and in transforming themselves into creative, responsible, disciplined political thinkers and actors, very little of which they will learn merely by working on the line, they will be able to act in accordance with their own revolutionary political vision that integrates all of the aspects of their human life, with an eye towards respecting humanity. In other words, we need workers who are trained in making moral and political choices.
Boggs’ goal for a worker-led democracy was that every worker be transformed into someone whom the community could depend on for theoretical and practical leadership.

It’s a good book. Political philosophers and theorists should read it. Her comportment is so spare and sincere. There is just not a lot of extra nonsense and defensiveness. It’s two hundred pages of a woman organizing and working and reading and speaking her way through the struggle.
That’s all for now.

I have some other knitting to do, but I’m going to post a Funky Academic video on marriage within a few weeks.

https://books.google.com/books?id=qwyo2b26Yl0C